Learn / Research
Research
Evidence-led analysis, public-source threat context, and field observations with claims clearly separated from inference.
How to use this collection
Bring a current decision and keep the evidence attached.
This collection is for decisions that need traceable context. It brings public-source threat reporting, frameworks, operating evidence, and field observations into a form Arizona leaders can evaluate without turning every signal into a sales claim.
Named sources support factual claims. AEGITz separates reported events from interpretation, notes where measurements are unavailable, and connects general research to the business condition that determines whether it matters.
- What did the source directly observe?
- What is AEGITz inferring from that evidence?
- Does the signal intersect a real business dependency?
Browse research
Choose the question closest to the work in front of you.
Each article opens with a direct answer and links to the related method, solution, or working resource when one applies.
Your Cyber Insurance Application Is an Audit You Grade Yourself
Cyber insurance applications turn technical answers into representations that may determine whether a future claim is paid. Here is how to answer with evidence instead of optimism.
Read guideA Framework Is Not a Control Set
Use NIST CSF 2.0 as a common decision language. Score current and target profiles, weight gaps by business criticality, and work a short, owned priority list.
Read how-to